Obama Perfectly Personifies Evil of Government
Far abroad, and in the neighborhood the vast majority of people which would also be the vast majority of (at least} eligible voters look to governments for the most critical of life (and death) aspects of society.
People look to government for legality.. which apparently most perilously (for all concerned), equate with universal morality.
And also apparently, to Cardinals and Popes alike, that’s a big Dangerfield OK, as far as the modern Catholic Church abdicates.. that, as long it passes the ‘personal’ conscience stink test… How sweet and socially non-abrasive pabulum.
Yes! that’s what I remember most about the Gospels, do it if it feels right and better, to someone else…. if it’s also ‘good’ for you.
Sadly, the ‘one’ anecdote en mass to government and Marxist control because it was not born of the world, the Catholic Church, has itself only modernly evolved into the stilled tail clenched in the jaws of the chasing dog, evil populist world.
The people also look to governments for national and ‘future’ bankrupting economic ‘universal’ safety nets far above the ground …. not far from the tight rope… that cannot possibly go the socialist distance or breadth of the continents, let alone the world.
When government gives to the poor it takes it back from the poor through enticement of easy money in numerous lottery numbers scam games and sport and casino betting and through heavy taxation in the billions, on products typically more abused by the poor such as drinking, smoking, so called medicinal pot use…etc.
But governments most damage to society could arguably be in the morality or rather immorality it legalizes, it indoctrinates youth with and now ‘enforced’ through reasonably unconstitutional quasi- judicial boards if and when, the official judicial branch rarely disappoints them.
Governments, directed by politicians, especially like Obama, promote and encourage abortion and advises that, “No young couple should be punished (socially or financially) with a pregnancy”.
Canada’s Stephen Harper and his equally politically correct party is of the mind that sex selection abortion is abhorrent but not enough to go against the modern status quo of tax payer funded abortion on demand anywhere in Canada. British rulers are worse.
Germany’s leader refuses to strike a Nazi initiated law that youth must be taught by State or heavy state control and homeschooled detractors are to have their families torn apart and parents imprisoned.
Divorces are legally expedited quicker than a honeymoon and homosexuals are allowed marriages and adoption rights.
Everyone has a government unmistakable immoral law that has worked for, or against, them up to and including murder by state order, and it is because of the populism required by immoral political leaders to win and because of (now) generations of taught and instilled narcissism, celebrity worship, and immorality, by Marxists that agents like Obama have the ‘fors’ they need to win elections.
Between populism, and celebrity worship it is adults who will vote Obama’s and Obama like governments no matter what their instincts or intelligence tell them and no matter what government immorality is established or further extrapolated towards enshrinement.
Why Is The Tea Party Not Leaving GOP?
For all the deserving condemnation media conservatives are heaping on the GOP ‘controlling elite’ why in earth are they not starting a third, and real conservative party over their liberal coveting key holders?
Look at the ‘Great One’, Mark Levin for example. He shouts long and loud with such stroke bursting intensity against the McCains and Christies of the MSM loving party dominators, that his membership only becomes a greater credibility killer with each passing day.
Of course, Mark, Rush, Hannity, Ingraham and the rest are right about it, but in Levin fashion, WHAT THE Hell ARE THEY GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!!, or are they just individual brilliant one-off renascence men and entertainers as Savage pitifully believes he is.
Does it go something like the myth (or fact) about cancer and diseases that ‘geniuses’ only have jobs and billions are made only as long as cures are not found?
But ‘membership’ must still have its privileges for people to be so despising of organizations they belong too and no one is forcing them to like a unionized shop.
Then there’s that old standard excuse across the U.S. and Canada of, “Well who else is there? Who has a chance to beat the liberals?
Except, that the Tea Party exists and it’s not likely anything better is going to be started from scratch before North America is destroyed. And the Tea Party has proven they can’t defeat GOP and elite GOP money. Nor can they change that dog by wagging its tail as a part of.
Pro-lifers have been barking up that tree in Canadian conservative parties since Brian Mulroney was there first GOP like liberal while giving the party the mandate the progressive party wanted and incredulously even publicly proclaimed so.
If there was only a liberal party and a communist party running and how far from that is the truth? Would these conservative celebrities feel compelled to belong to the liberal party to change it from ‘within’?
The Tea Party needs to pick up the conservative flag and fly it alone.
Oh the vote will be split, but that split will be between the two liberal parties of the Democrats and the new progressive GOP.
There is clear polarization and real conservatives thank God and Christ for that.
From Conservative Extinct
Where conservative political genius is considered to be… to adopt a party policy of being against sex selective abortions …… but being for paid abortion on demand? The new progressive conservatism of no balls and no principles, no brains, no heart, no soul.
So Rush never felt so betrayed by the Republicans than he has now in the election Cuccinelli lost in Virginia.
Apparently, the GOP elite didn’t want a tea partier to win and wanted to use him as a lesson to all tea partiers that they want purged from their new purist politically correct party.
I might remind Rush that Obama wouldn’t be in power today had the Reaganites and the GOP not had stars in their eyes when they wanted their man Romney in as they saw him as the best moderate of the time to put the party back in power.
As if the MSM wasn’t enough of a foe for Santorum the Reaganites did as much to support Santorum as the GOP did for Cuccinelli. Drudge carried water for the GOP united team back then and even Rush’s stand in Mark Steyn claimed that a vote for Santorum was a vote for theocracy (oh pleeze).
Anytime Santorum gained a little traction, the GOP tag team snuffed him out beginning with the first primary that he won and where the
GOP for a while was won by Romney.
Then, there was the attacks on Santorum’s family repeated by ‘conservative’ talk show Reaganites and Drudge.
Well, what goes around comes around and the GOP and the Reaganites got what they deserved and will continue to face disasters with little support from principled Judeo-Christians who don’t cancel or waylay basic beliefs for compromised ‘power’ of any party including the GOP.
The Reaganites need to find a new party because it is obvious the GOP has dumped them like they did Judeo-Christians…. in a heartbeat.
They need to walk the walk everyday of every 4 years.
Logic Takes No Credit In Political/Legal Homosexual Pass
All of the advances made in homosexual activism have only been achieved in modern history and only through leftist establishment sympathies. Starting with AIDS, and afternoon tv talk show sensationalism and up to most recently, with Huffington Post anonymous, yet perfectly worded and ostensibly actual letters written within families of ‘bully’ or tough love parents and poor hurting soul homosexual offspring whose emotional ‘feelings’ make up, goes.. you have to love my behavioral perversions to really love me.
Whereas, most of the adult general population would at least feel mutually uncomfortable sharing their sexual proclivities with their parents, activists have it that homosexuals need affirmation and shoulders to cry on for obsessed perversions. More over now we are to take it that homosexuality is even superior in the situation of child rearing.. pun intended.
But,let’s take the AIDS sexually transmitted disease for an example of exactly how the homosexual perversion skews judgment.
All homosexuals had to do during the AIDS epidemic was to abstain from sex acts with strangers, not their regulars… but with strangers.
So,they would knowingly risk their lives for one particular aspect of their sexual escapades… ‘stranger sex encounters’.
This is not the actions of anyone in control of their perverse activities never mind just not exercising good judgment. In fact, near the end of the era just before drugs were discovered that could treat AIDS, there were media reports of young homosexual men actually seeking the added thrill of a perverse kind Russian Roulette game of stranger homosexual encounters at homosexual meeting places.
Now even in the face of abuse horror stories popping up around the world with male homosexuals abusing young males given to them by the state for adoption the illogical politicization of personal choices of homosexual sex acts are still granted societal equality more said, preference for very ‘unnatural families’.
And if homosexuals would risk their lives just to have homosexual acts with strangers why would they not more easily cave to their urges and impulses of risking homosexuality abuse on children as by far, most re-offenders do?
If they have evolved so far off the normalcy curve of natural pro-creation sexuality to unhealthy disgusting acts of buggery how is a second perversion of abusing children so unfathomable?
And if homosexuals are allowed marriage rights, why shouldn’t bisexual threesomes be allowed to marry.
Are their feelings not hurt as well when people don’t praise their sexual choices.
The modern cultural praise of the homosexual ‘lifestyles’ took decades to come about because so many millions of people had to be bombarded on so many fronts of the liberal establishment; journalism, entertainment, political, judicial and academic cultural socialism, in order to go against their own instincts, and sensibilities, naturally prone to logic.
And they could only accomplish it over decades with the one tool that would work… ‘sympathy’ and a slow water torture drip of being constantly in the headlines and performers of entertainment shows and Hollywood ‘Oscar’ award winning movies that old actors even gravitated to,like Michael Douglass and Christopher Plummer in hopes of getting their due Hollywood recognition before checking out through the short cut of liberal ultra- populism.
Absolute narcissistic choice has nothing to do with responsibility in fact, lies in defiance of responsibility. God save the children of the world.
As in the last viro homo-sympathy letter from Huffington Post ostensibly about a father writing his son and disapproving of his lifestyle in a 'heartless' fashion, the B.S. meter is off the scale,with this year's Jerry Springer or Opray- like HP entry of a grandfather disowning his daughter for disowning her homosexual son.
Of course, both letters were anonymous though their cause has been the populist cream of wheat for establishment, academic, entertainment, MSM editorials sprayed over low information masses of mushrooms that folklore and epic heroes are made of, for a generation now.
But no matter, these are the 'brave' souls, last out of the closet and so blinded by their world small t humanist truths they can't see their own stretched sphincters are squarely planted among friends in all but Russia and all official Islamic nations. Don't buy any of the reasons for such heart-string 'anonymous' posts except for the one that these incidents never happened in any sense that the participants provided H.P. with a copy whether hand written or accompanied with a photo of the backs of the participants.
No, the b.s. needle points to the fact that these people and this letter never existed but it appears we can expect them on at least an annual basis or whenever an up and coming journalist or his publishers need a boost in ratings from a viral post. Every word is obviously contrived from what Christian hating gays like to paint as the stereotypes of Christians. Like homo activists would never attempt to play on the emotions of others?
They have to be anonymous and will forever remain anonymous like a comment on a a common news blog because the last thing that they can do is to be called up on .......duhhh.
No one is dying of AIDS anymore so the tried and true populist sympathy strategy has to look for a new venue and it's now all they have to 'continue to move forward' when there is nothing else to support and greatly elevate the mere sex act of male buggery of a 'lifesyle' that owns pedophilia like no other yet be elevated to the high society heights they have attained including adoption rights to male babies and children.
Where's the logic and truth in any of this perverse new populist paradigm that came to attrition with the AIDS epidemic in itself an STD of immoral humanist choice.
I have eight children and if any of them 'came out' of the populist closet neither would they be welcome in my house especially when I still have boys at home.
Question... if all homosexuals are born to bugger, (there's a tee shirt for this proud lifestyle no one should be afraid to wear) are all bisexuals born that way too, is all the modern populist population explosion of transsexuals and cross-dressers born that way too?
So I can thank big liberal talk radio Toronto station 640 and the Bill Carroll liberal stooge show for bringing all this to my attention.
Last week like a run of the mill liberal talk show host, Bill topped a show with bull shit comments about a discussion we should be having about assisted suicide a cause long taken care of by government (only too happy to) run... palliative care that needs little and often no incentive or permission to assist in murder never mind wanted suicide.
Whenever a liberal says we need a mature discussion about anything, he means all dissension is immature and you will listen, agree, and do as I say and we will make it law so all resistance is futile.
For this homo piece Bill Carroll told his listeners that as longer as daughters like the one in this 'story'
'ARE ALIVE' ( in other same words, allowed to live) .homos will have never find happiness. It would seem odd to me that one would ever find happiness so steeped in evil perversions like buggery and pedophilia and why are they looking down there and in there for happiness in the first place?
How tribal narcissistic and populist humanist Not to mention why does their happiness depend on costing the rest of society vast sums of money now apparently including socialist government affirmative action and special interest?
Blast From the ‘60s’ Past & Right Up Mark Levin’s Alley
Jack Benny, William Holden and Bob Hope Aid Priest and His Movement In Defending Declaration of Independence
I was given a DVD of 39 episodes of the Jack Benny Show and one filmed around 1960 I found quite interesting.
If you are a controlling liberal freak or a communist (many would argue what’s the difference?) you would probably categorize it as a contrived political propaganda show.. and there is no doubt it was contrived.
But, if you are a normal freedom loving Judeo-Christian you would see it as a WTF just happened to normalcy, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and to the greatest free world nation defender of Christianity, the greatest free religion of the world?
You are still swearing it, but you may be surprised that it was being said in 1960 and surprised by whom was saying it then.
The show was called, You Can Change The World, and it was centered around Father Keller, founder of the Christopher Movement and the film piece primarily dealt with the Declaration of Independence and how it had been trampled on so far (up to1960, that is)
It featured Hollywood entertainers, Jack Benny, William Holden, Bob Hope, Bing Crosby who sung a song just written for the movement, Loretta Young, Paul Douglass, Ann Blyth and Irene Dunne, along with the most somber, Rochester you’ll ever see on the reading of a letter from Abraham Lincoln referring to the Declaration of Independence.
The main thrust of the show was how God was so intrinsically melded to the civilized founding of a Christian Nation Republic and how the nation was really under attack at the time.
Around the same time, the Communists of America’s ‘agenda’ was being presented to a State Committee on the other coast, Florida.. wherein there agenda wanted to, and did, infiltrate the exact same institutions the Christopher movement wanted to win back.. most notably, education and the teaching profession, of which Marxists had taken control during World War II, and more so, after World War II. Specific comment is made of the same Karl Marx liberals were whorshipping.
You can view or purchase (11 bucks I believe) the show on line. Or, buy the Jack Benny 39 episode DVD which probably wouldn’t cost much more and view it on that.
Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin (not to mention the Catholic Church), and others wouldn’t do themselves any harm in playing snip- bits on their shows. It does show that some famous liberals at the time even had a ‘line in the sand’ they wouldn’t cross.
I wonder how the three Stooges felt?
“Now cut that out!”
Hey Hudak Quit Counting Only On Protest Vote
(can't get compose section to work only stupid HTML... wish google would screwing around with things... fire some people if they can't find any work to do))
A number of liberal financial blunders may win some protest votes in the popular vote over to the progressives, but ‘it’s the policies stupid’!
Policies of which Canadian conservative parties have none, nada zippo. Preferring that Mac’s Milk could carry booze is not much of a policy and it’s all you got…at least that you would like to share with anyone including voters!
In such absence it can only be assumed that the Ontario conservative party is happy to assume and move forward with liberal policies. .. or where the most damage was accomplished on Canadian citizens living in Toronto owned Ontario.
(pretty sad when citizens wary of their home provinces tramping on their rights through un-mandated legislation and decree, have to look to the feds for a sliver of security)
Protest votes are not enough to shake the apathy out of voters when you ‘promise’ to do… absolutely nothing different. Yes!... Continue, and add to the political correctness tool the liberals really and proudly transformed the whole province with, under, liberal establishment fan- out, stigmatization, decree, order, lawyer and force of law. That’s the way to this voter’s heart.
But here’s the real funny thing. Except for the downtown core of Toronto or the ‘gay village’ in the world of it is, what it is…. Rob Ford rules. Did you get that Conservatives, Rob Ford rules and where it counts…in the polls.
Look slightly to the west and and thoroughly non-PC Hazel rules…even did, before Harris came along and well out lived is two faced political career.
No bells being rung yet? … thought so!
That’s the way it is with politicians who run just for the sake of position and longevity and not on principles. McGuinty had more principles than any modern conservatives if certainly the wrong ones… as do the NDP. Conservatives don’t even have a rotten platform to fall through never mind a good one.
As it is, I would never ever vote liberal, but neither would I vote for any modern day conservative such as they have been for a number of elections now.
If you want to start and make a difference somewhere, start with the sweetheart deal the liberals have with the teacher’s unions where they co-conspire to misappropriate tax payer’s money today and worse on tomorrow’s credit. It never did Harris any harm and it was the one promise he kept.
What most people remember conservative guru Reagan for is taking on a public union.