Wednesday, October 23, 2013

:Logic Takes No Credit in Political/Legal Homosexual..Pass

Logic Takes No Credit In Political/Legal Homosexual Pass All of the advances made in homosexual activism have only been achieved in modern history and only through leftist establishment sympathies. Starting with AIDS, and afternoon tv talk show sensationalism and up to most recently, with Huffington Post anonymous, yet perfectly worded and ostensibly actual letters written within families of ‘bully’ or tough love parents and poor hurting soul homosexual offspring whose emotional ‘feelings’ make up, goes.. you have to love my behavioral perversions to really love me. Whereas, most of the adult general population would at least feel mutually uncomfortable sharing their sexual proclivities with their parents, activists have it that homosexuals need affirmation and shoulders to cry on for obsessed perversions. More over now we are to take it that homosexuality is even superior in the situation of child rearing.. pun intended. But,let’s take the AIDS sexually transmitted disease for an example of exactly how the homosexual perversion skews judgment. All homosexuals had to do during the AIDS epidemic was to abstain from sex acts with strangers, not their regulars… but with strangers. So,they would knowingly risk their lives for one particular aspect of their sexual escapades… ‘stranger sex encounters’. This is not the actions of anyone in control of their perverse activities never mind just not exercising good judgment. In fact, near the end of the era just before drugs were discovered that could treat AIDS, there were media reports of young homosexual men actually seeking the added thrill of a perverse kind Russian Roulette game of stranger homosexual encounters at homosexual meeting places. Now even in the face of abuse horror stories popping up around the world with male homosexuals abusing young males given to them by the state for adoption the illogical politicization of personal choices of homosexual sex acts are still granted societal equality more said, preference for very ‘unnatural families’. And if homosexuals would risk their lives just to have homosexual acts with strangers why would they not more easily cave to their urges and impulses of risking homosexuality abuse on children as by far, most re-offenders do? If they have evolved so far off the normalcy curve of natural pro-creation sexuality to unhealthy disgusting acts of buggery how is a second perversion of abusing children so unfathomable? And if homosexuals are allowed marriage rights, why shouldn’t bisexual threesomes be allowed to marry. Are their feelings not hurt as well when people don’t praise their sexual choices. The modern cultural praise of the homosexual ‘lifestyles’ took decades to come about because so many millions of people had to be bombarded on so many fronts of the liberal establishment; journalism, entertainment, political, judicial and academic cultural socialism, in order to go against their own instincts, and sensibilities, naturally prone to logic. And they could only accomplish it over decades with the one tool that would work… ‘sympathy’ and a slow water torture drip of being constantly in the headlines and performers of entertainment shows and Hollywood ‘Oscar’ award winning movies that old actors even gravitated to,like Michael Douglass and Christopher Plummer in hopes of getting their due Hollywood recognition before checking out through the short cut of liberal ultra- populism. Absolute narcissistic choice has nothing to do with responsibility in fact, lies in defiance of responsibility. God save the children of the world. Paul Gordon

Friday, October 4, 2013

More Huffington Post Homo B.S. Sympathy and Bill Carroll

As in the last viro homo-sympathy letter from Huffington Post  ostensibly about a father writing his son and disapproving of his lifestyle in a 'heartless' fashion, the B.S. meter is off the scale,with this year's Jerry Springer or Opray- like HP entry of a grandfather disowning his daughter for disowning her homosexual son.

Of course, both letters were anonymous though their cause has been the populist cream of wheat for establishment, academic, entertainment, MSM editorials sprayed over low information masses of mushrooms that folklore and epic heroes are made of, for a generation now.

But no matter, these are the 'brave' souls, last out of the closet and so blinded by their world small t humanist truths they can't see their own stretched sphincters are squarely planted among friends in all but Russia and all official Islamic nations.  Don't buy any of the reasons for such heart-string 'anonymous' posts except for the one that these incidents never happened in any sense that the participants  provided H.P. with a copy whether hand written or accompanied with a photo of the backs of the participants.

No, the b.s. needle points to the fact that these people and this letter never existed but it appears we can expect them on at least an annual basis or whenever an up and coming journalist or his publishers need a boost in ratings from a viral post. Every word is obviously contrived from what Christian hating gays like to paint as the stereotypes of Christians. Like homo activists would never attempt to play on the emotions of others?

They have to be anonymous and will forever remain anonymous like a comment on a a common news blog because the last thing that they can do is to be called up on .......duhhh.

No one is dying of AIDS anymore so the tried and true populist sympathy strategy has to look for a new venue and it's now all they have to 'continue to move forward' when there  is nothing else to support and greatly elevate the mere sex act of male buggery of a 'lifesyle' that owns pedophilia like no other yet be elevated to the high society heights they have attained including adoption rights to male babies and children.

Where's the logic and truth in any of this perverse new populist paradigm that came to attrition with the AIDS epidemic in itself an STD of immoral humanist choice.

I have eight children and if any of them 'came out' of the populist closet neither would they be welcome in my house especially when I still have boys at home.

Question... if all homosexuals are born to bugger, (there's a tee shirt for this proud lifestyle no one should be afraid to wear) are all bisexuals born that way too, is all the modern populist population explosion of  transsexuals and cross-dressers born that way too?

So I can thank big liberal talk radio Toronto station 640 and the Bill Carroll liberal stooge show for bringing all this to my attention.

Last week like a run of the mill liberal talk show host,  Bill topped a show with bull shit comments about a discussion we should be having about assisted suicide a cause long taken care of by government (only too happy to) run... palliative care that needs little and often no incentive or permission to assist in murder never mind wanted suicide.

Whenever a liberal says we need a mature discussion about anything, he means all dissension is immature and you will listen, agree, and do as I say and we will make it law so all resistance is futile.

For this homo piece Bill Carroll told his listeners that as longer as daughters like the one in this 'story'
'ARE ALIVE' ( in other same words, allowed to live)  .homos will have never find happiness.  It would seem odd to me that one would ever find happiness so steeped in evil perversions like buggery and pedophilia and why are they looking down there and in there for happiness in the first place?

How tribal narcissistic and populist humanist  Not to mention why does their happiness depend on costing the rest of society vast sums of money now apparently including socialist government affirmative action and special interest?

Paul Gordon.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Blast From 1960 Past And Right Up Mark Levin's Alley

Blast From the ‘60s’ Past & Right Up Mark Levin’s Alley Jack Benny, William Holden and Bob Hope Aid Priest and His Movement In Defending Declaration of Independence I was given a DVD of 39 episodes of the Jack Benny Show and one filmed around 1960 I found quite interesting. If you are a controlling liberal freak or a communist (many would argue what’s the difference?) you would probably categorize it as a contrived political propaganda show.. and there is no doubt it was contrived. But, if you are a normal freedom loving Judeo-Christian you would see it as a WTF just happened to normalcy, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and to the greatest free world nation defender of Christianity, the greatest free religion of the world? You are still swearing it, but you may be surprised that it was being said in 1960 and surprised by whom was saying it then. The show was called, You Can Change The World, and it was centered around Father Keller, founder of the Christopher Movement and the film piece primarily dealt with the Declaration of Independence and how it had been trampled on so far (up to1960, that is) It featured Hollywood entertainers, Jack Benny, William Holden, Bob Hope, Bing Crosby who sung a song just written for the movement, Loretta Young, Paul Douglass, Ann Blyth and Irene Dunne, along with the most somber, Rochester you’ll ever see on the reading of a letter from Abraham Lincoln referring to the Declaration of Independence. The main thrust of the show was how God was so intrinsically melded to the civilized founding of a Christian Nation Republic and how the nation was really under attack at the time. Around the same time, the Communists of America’s ‘agenda’ was being presented to a State Committee on the other coast, Florida.. wherein there agenda wanted to, and did, infiltrate the exact same institutions the Christopher movement wanted to win back.. most notably, education and the teaching profession, of which Marxists had taken control during World War II, and more so, after World War II. Specific comment is made of the same Karl Marx liberals were whorshipping. You can view or purchase (11 bucks I believe) the show on line. Or, buy the Jack Benny 39 episode DVD which probably wouldn’t cost much more and view it on that. Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin (not to mention the Catholic Church), and others wouldn’t do themselves any harm in playing snip- bits on their shows. It does show that some famous liberals at the time even had a ‘line in the sand’ they wouldn’t cross. I wonder how the three Stooges felt? “Now cut that out!” Paul Gordon