More Huffington Post Homo B.S. Sympathy and Bill Carroll

As in the last viro homo-sympathy letter from Huffington Post  ostensibly about a father writing his son and disapproving of his lifestyle in a 'heartless' fashion, the B.S. meter is off the scale,with this year's Jerry Springer or Opray- like HP entry of a grandfather disowning his daughter for disowning her homosexual son.

Of course, both letters were anonymous though their cause has been the populist cream of wheat for establishment, academic, entertainment, MSM editorials sprayed over low information masses of mushrooms that folklore and epic heroes are made of, for a generation now.

But no matter, these are the 'brave' souls, last out of the closet and so blinded by their world small t humanist truths they can't see their own stretched sphincters are squarely planted among friends in all but Russia and all official Islamic nations.  Don't buy any of the reasons for such heart-string 'anonymous' posts except for the one that these incidents never happened in any sense that the participants  provided H.P. with a copy whether hand written or accompanied with a photo of the backs of the participants.

No, the b.s. needle points to the fact that these people and this letter never existed but it appears we can expect them on at least an annual basis or whenever an up and coming journalist or his publishers need a boost in ratings from a viral post. Every word is obviously contrived from what Christian hating gays like to paint as the stereotypes of Christians. Like homo activists would never attempt to play on the emotions of others?

They have to be anonymous and will forever remain anonymous like a comment on a a common news blog because the last thing that they can do is to be called up on .......duhhh.

No one is dying of AIDS anymore so the tried and true populist sympathy strategy has to look for a new venue and it's now all they have to 'continue to move forward' when there  is nothing else to support and greatly elevate the mere sex act of male buggery of a 'lifesyle' that owns pedophilia like no other yet be elevated to the high society heights they have attained including adoption rights to male babies and children.

Where's the logic and truth in any of this perverse new populist paradigm that came to attrition with the AIDS epidemic in itself an STD of immoral humanist choice.

I have eight children and if any of them 'came out' of the populist closet neither would they be welcome in my house especially when I still have boys at home.

Question... if all homosexuals are born to bugger, (there's a tee shirt for this proud lifestyle no one should be afraid to wear) are all bisexuals born that way too, is all the modern populist population explosion of  transsexuals and cross-dressers born that way too?

So I can thank big liberal talk radio Toronto station 640 and the Bill Carroll liberal stooge show for bringing all this to my attention.

Last week like a run of the mill liberal talk show host,  Bill topped a show with bull shit comments about a discussion we should be having about assisted suicide a cause long taken care of by government (only too happy to) run... palliative care that needs little and often no incentive or permission to assist in murder never mind wanted suicide.

Whenever a liberal says we need a mature discussion about anything, he means all dissension is immature and you will listen, agree, and do as I say and we will make it law so all resistance is futile.

For this homo piece Bill Carroll told his listeners that as longer as daughters like the one in this 'story'
'ARE ALIVE' ( in other same words, allowed to live)  .homos will have never find happiness.  It would seem odd to me that one would ever find happiness so steeped in evil perversions like buggery and pedophilia and why are they looking down there and in there for happiness in the first place?

How tribal narcissistic and populist humanist  Not to mention why does their happiness depend on costing the rest of society vast sums of money now apparently including socialist government affirmative action and special interest?


Paul Gordon.