The modern
GOP has traditionally favored compromised presidential candidates over
candidates of principles much to the
dismay, more importantly at the ‘expense’ of Christian socons.
George Bush the
younger did come closest to being the greatest hope for pro-lifers, but he
certainly had his disconcerting moments in his second term.
On one
occasion, he deferred to a ‘telephone’ support call when the Capital was
surrounded by at least a 100,000 pro-life witnesses over stepping outside the
front door and addressing them in person.
Then there
was his Sotomayor Supreme Court nomination which confirmed Bush didn’t care
anymore about Presidential vocation.
His
tax payer billion(s) dollar AIDS donation only proved he wanted to be
remembered as a politically correct nice guy.
However, on
the pro-life front George W. was a saint compared to Reagan in ‘actual pro-life
contribution’ (read more important to lives of babies than adult activists).
Reagan had
one Supreme Court Justice nomination and he squandered on one who was more
liberal than remotely conservative. Betrayed Evangelicals threatened to pull
the plug on the Gipper on more than one occasion.
There was
one thing all these ‘Christian conservative Presidents did share however, and possibly
a good explanation why they tried to do very little on the baby-killing
industry.
They were all married to strongly opinionated pro-abortion women of
the sisterhood. From Nancy to Laura, how could their true beliefs not affect
their husband’s actions and lack thereof?
Now if there
is an extra Wonder of the World that is hard to fathom, it is how a pro-life
man could be married to a strong pro-abortion woman?
That in
itself lays bare the sincerity of ambitious politicians and their wives. It would seem that their wives find it much
harder to lie as easily and so they don’t comment on moral issues at all until
hubby’s term is over.
Starting
with this run-up to the 2016 Presidential election socons need to be more
inquiring of ‘potential’ First Ladies to get a more honest and accurate picture
of how the next Presidency will carry
out its course.
If there is
one thing a socon dislikes more than the enemy it is ’friendly enemies’
pretending, or claiming to be on side.
When you are
the leading nation in the free world a lot of lives depend on your wisdom and
serious consideration not your status, ambition and social life.
Paul Gordon
No comments:
Post a Comment