I wrote the following comment into a Joseph Farrah column on pulling kids out of school.

*****************

How True Joseph right now in Ontario Canada  married lesbian Premiere Kathleen Wynne is enforcing an un-mandated extreme sex ed curriculum authored by a now imprisoned pedophile.... to begin in September. Truth is stranger than fiction

There is a huge public outcry but like any liberal she is giving affected children and parents the finger.

Yet on liberal talk shows (there are no other kinds in Canada)parents are phoning in saying what's the problem pull your kids just out of those classes. Well gee I wonder what these classmates will be obsessing with with in recess socialization after having their innocence raped by the State in class!   

With media, and teen entertainment these days school socialization can't help but hurt your kids. Peer pressure is more affected by perversion than it ever was in the 'learning it on the street' days. 

The government liberal establishment cornered the market on smokes booze gambling pot and prostitution but they're going to have your child's best interest at heart with no choice education?

What Happens When The Anti Establishment Becomes One

Crap Happens When The ‘Anti’ Establishment Becomes One

Liberals and their various media minions will only refer to pro-life individuals and organizations as anti-abortion.

 Of course we are, but towards a positive direction, not unlike being anti-any kind of sinister evil… anti- terrorist, anti-Nazi etc.

What kind of positive spin can a pro-abortion person pin to anyone’s abortion certainly not the child being brutally murdered?

However, the real and proud purveyors of anarchy are of course the definitive misnomer of true meaning, liberalism.

Let me offer just some of their old socialist standards they embrace and employ through populism to win their objectives.

They are of course anti-life in regards to the young, the old and the infirmed.

They are definitively anti- choice when it comes to education, certainly no more exemplified than in the current Wynne government in Ontario.

They are anti-family (on so many fronts) of any traditional (there are no other kinds historically) sense.  They are anti-free enterprise, anti-law rule and order. 

They would not have gun ownership, but won’t stand for gun crime serious penalties.

Look at just retired, Toronto police chief, Bill Blair. One day into his retirement  he is on TV with Justin Trudeau with glowing reviews of legalizing pot if they are elected. So is he against pot legalization now and lying or was he for pot and deceiving a city and the Police Chief’s Association while he was police chief.

In any case, only a liberal authority gets away with arresting and detaining citizens without legal cause the police Chief Association while police chief.

They are anti-fiscal responsible and live only to rule for the day. Greek liberals simply refuse to accept anything less than civic labor unions status quo raises and how far from their closing cold reality is Ontario as it is continually economically downgraded.

They are anti-free speech if it is any word, idea, thought or action they simply  (and often hysterically) disagree with employing puritanical daily evolving political correctness.. to fit their image they are determined to keep useful.

They are anti- innocence and use children’s ‘own safety’ as their Trojan horse to scandalize children at younger and younger ages through one education of no choice, with as much democracy employed as a drunken Human Right’s unelected tribunal.

Their world view is skewed such that they see oppression in those who oppress

and would have no part of rescuing the afflicted, and abused, especially if they are Christian, their perpetual worst possible enemy, abroad and at home.  

They totally inflate the inane and ignore real rights and real disasters. 

They are in fact anti-world.

GOP Potential First Ladies Historically More Honest Indicators Over Presidental Candidates

Potential First Ladies More To The Truth of Prez. Candidates

The modern GOP has traditionally favored compromised presidential candidates over candidates of principles much to the dismay, more importantly at the ‘expense’ of Christian socons.

George Bush the younger did come closest to being the greatest hope for pro-lifers, but he certainly had his disconcerting moments in his second term.

On one occasion, he deferred to a ‘telephone’ support call when the Capital was surrounded by at least a 100,000 pro-life witnesses over stepping outside the front door and addressing them in person.

Then there was his Sotomayor Supreme Court nomination which confirmed Bush didn’t care anymore about Presidential vocation.  

His tax payer billion(s) dollar AIDS donation only proved he wanted to be remembered as a politically correct nice guy.

However, on the pro-life front George W. was a saint compared to Reagan in ‘actual pro-life contribution’ (read more important to lives of babies than adult activists).

Reagan had one Supreme Court Justice nomination and he squandered on one who was more liberal than remotely conservative. Betrayed Evangelicals threatened to pull the plug on the Gipper on more than one occasion.

There was one thing all these ‘Christian conservative Presidents did share however, and possibly a good explanation why they tried to do very little on the baby-killing industry. 

They were all married to strongly opinionated pro-abortion women of the sisterhood. From Nancy to Laura, how could their true beliefs not affect their husband’s actions and lack thereof?

Now if there is an extra Wonder of the World that is hard to fathom, it is how a pro-life man could be married to a strong pro-abortion woman?

That in itself lays bare the sincerity of ambitious politicians and their wives.  It would seem that their wives find it much harder to lie as easily and so they don’t comment on moral issues at all until hubby’s term is over.        

Starting with this run-up to the 2016 Presidential election socons need to be more inquiring of ‘potential’ First Ladies to get a more honest and accurate picture of how the next  Presidency will carry out its course.

If there is one thing a socon dislikes more than the enemy it is ’friendly enemies’ pretending, or claiming to be on side.

When you are the leading nation in the free world a lot of lives depend on your wisdom and serious consideration not your status, ambition and social life.

Paul Gordon