How Do You Handle A Problem Like Ann Coulter?
Not very well, if you are the RCMP, Ottawa Police, F.. A. Houle, University of Ottawa, Ontario Human 'Rights' Commish, the Province of Ontario, Canadian Parliament, or the Nation of Canada.
In one tri-university, 'diversity', road trip, Ann Coulter set the Canadian captives of true conservationism free, or at least put a smile on their face.
She showed just how Euro-U.N. centric Canada, a nation, like all that can only be judged and graded on its present, sum totals and make-up, had become. Nothing leads to the future like the present and in a recent poll, by far, the majority of Canadians stated they would not defend Canada against a serious attack.
One might be forgiven for reading this as a real hedonist nation of narcissists simply waiting for their moment of laying on the ice on their backsides with a beer and a cigar and/or a lot of immigrants whose heart and allegiances simply lie, with their longer historic birth nations .
Canada had become a nation of intellectual thickened fluids, dependent on values, courage and the thinking of stellar world centres of independent (leftist capitulation) like the U.K. France, Germany, Italy, and not least of all, Scandinavia, belly button and bland lint collector.
Hey, as Ann alluded to, when you're too pumped on Tim Horton's, Molsons, hockey, and cigars, I would add homosexuals, and that's just the women, whose got time for the important things in life when you can just steal them from loser nation's and take the gutless, leaderless government's word for it.
Yes, Ann shot down yet another victim sniper, leftist Arab-Canuck seventeen year-old which would be like 45 years old in modern snotty and innocence- lost, years, or one year before turning fiscal conservative. The feelings 'victim' who came innocently to a public forum with an “open mind” also happens to have an open mind about her own Jew hating blog.
Hey, Honey, if you're going to an Ann Coulter speak-slap to the limp-wristed and snickering terrorists supporters if- so facts-so... you're hardly innocent or a cry-baby victim. Activists who play victims just don't do it anymore in the blogisphere age of non- priviledged, or preferred coment speech.
A nation that subversively gives its highest award to its greatest baby killer of all times, (and then its official blind morons like Harper do-nothing- special, like in this case, call the whole thing off... not to mention, call off its bureaucracy gone-wild, backed thought patrol play- judges), is hardly a courageous nation of deep thinkers or freedom defenders from Marxist and socialist control from the left, as so poetically and eloquently demonstrated, in A. Houle's email to Ann. Thank you Frank.
What would have happened if Ann was to threaten to go to Queen's University, Kingston On., Ontario's beloved ivy single, where they recently had , maybe still have, official sent student, thought control, ease dropping hall monitor police like Hitler's youth snitches for the greater 'good' of the community.
Keep those home-fires of real freedoms burning for the free world, in the one nation that still cares about such, Ann.
On an unrelated note, Lifesite, again foolishly heaped praise on leftist, Liberal party self-called pro-lifers having learned nothing from the Democrat 'pro-life' fiasco.
They should not be ingratiating a whole pro-death party for the sake of three (opportunist like, big tent democrats) who voted at at time when their party is leaderless and hanging low in the polls. I wonder where their price bar begins, threat of Party expulsion?
Of course, with Harper you never know what to expect anymore, which is the problem, in that you can't predict and certainly can't count on him for anything.
The Federal pro-life liberal caucus, now down to apparently three , has shown its true colors in the past while keeping up, donations to Lifesite/Campaign Life Coalition and slumming the Church crowds while the political baby killing scene has only progressed for the worst for the last ohhh fifty years or so, but let's hold out for the big liberal move.
Let's see, politics and ideology or babies lives, hmmm, who to choose... what to do?
As stated by American pro-life leaders, the notion of 'pro-life leftists' is a myth.
P.S. Please visit and sign my petition site to the Vatican to proclaim, 'The Year of Christ the Truth' as everyone seems to have forgotten and acts like Pontious Pilate looking for a better way with the bloodied Christ standing in front of him.
Paul Gordon
Friday, March 26, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Vatican Attacked by the Left, But for Church's Leftist Element
Vatican Attacked by the Left, But for Church's Leftist Element
From the guardian.co.uk...The Observer, we have the Vatican hate musings of a person whose very name invokes the image of a right of media snobbery upper class heritage.
Fintan O'toole (naturally), assistant editor of the Irish Times, writes with all the fraudulent authority the left has smothered the Euro and American masses with since taking to the throne of the establishment since the years of my youth when the world firmly adopted the religion of Marxism.
I'm sure the Guardian is Canada's Toronto Star, (most infamous for its anti religion, religion section) and Globe and Mail, is Americas New York Times and L. A Times and on and on through out Europe, and free Asia, though probably not Africa as the left deems ignorance and poverty an ensured necessity to 'eternally' champion like the shiny unturned rock, Louisiana (thanks to inferior unionized education) turned out to be, and most of South America.
To the left nothing is cuter than native tribes intrinsic freedom rights to be barbaric, tribal, poor and without medicine or modern technology...how 'worldian' of them, though like abortion they 'personally' would not want that lifestyle for themselves and nor should these natives have too many children.
O'toole is quite right about various entities playing free and loose (with the truth I take it) “for the greater good”, but too conveniently, he omits the greatest propaganda front of all, the print and news-media, with the entertainment industry closely and comfortably accelerating up the rear.
With the news media especially, for all its claimed high moral ground, it is increasingly hard to distinguish between 'fact' and editorial twist and comment.
So here's the Church according to Fintan. “It is not about sex and it is not about Catholicism. It is not, as Pope Benedict rightly argued in yesterday's distressingly bland pastoral letter, about priestly celibacy. It is about power”. Mind you, when you read his whole article it appears it is more about Fintan's personal distaste for the Catholic Church period.
Yes, lay people, Fintan is here to reveal the Church structure, itself.. is the evil of the Church. And here is how Fintan would save the Church. Firstly, he would adhered to the leftist desires of Vatican II, highlighted best by Toronto's deceased Cardinal Carter, early sixties socialist revolutionist, whose greatest accomplishment (going by his biography) was when he (was what moved by the Holy Ghost?) to break into Vatican offices over night, and with liberal accomplices altered Vatican documents to go “their way”.
O'toole would save the Church with the implementation of democracy. The same none religious savior with a non religious entity, that destroyed other churches open to the faddish whims and temporal and secular longings of the majority that works so well politically by morally and financially bankrupting former prosperous nations of the world.
The same entity of sound doctrine that is open to contamination from whatever propaganda laced corruption of 'power' is currently held by, including academia and with hedonistic laws well suited for the perpetuation of mental illness, primary based on the misplaced emotions of mentally ill Hollywood.
Democracy has it's place, but to say it is the cure all, that it is perfection itself, is quite asinine and a dangerous statute to live by. Democracy is the libertarian belief that brings out and enshrines the worst in people along with the best intentions. It is simply another marker of the 'world' not of heaven.
The true evil of the Church is the Left, which made its greatest inroads exactly, during the period of Fintan's fondest memories, Vatican II, the early sixties, the sex and drug revolution, the narcissistic inspired revolutions of feminism, the acceptance by liberal Bishop Conferences of the veto of spiritual givens by individual, leftist establishment 'formed' individual consciences that went against natural inherent consciouses formed by the Holy Ghost.
The true evil of the Church was the acceptance of the Left's greatest victim champions, homosexuals who were welcomed with open arms into the Church and permeated the Church on all but one level.
Not all homosexuals are pedophiles, but like almost all terrorists these days are Muslim, how can it possibly be argued that all men who molest boys are not homosexuals. What truth is this, but the same truth that says homosexuality is normal and healthy?
And too, a less true, or logically applied statement of the left would be hard to find than, 'an unmarried man, or man who does not experience sex with a female, has a unresisting attraction to having sex with little boys, or other men for that matter. That's a heck of a stretch of propaganda.
How can homosexuals cry for non-discrimination on all matters of the world, and yet blame, and attempt to tear down the Church for the actions of its homosexuals that the Pope is now trying to deal with and expel?
The cure to the Church's problems is hardly to emulate the world even more, but to distinguish itself even more.
The religions of the world are atheism, narcissism, pantheism, Marxism, fanatic idolatry equally of the living and the dead, equating nationalism, academia, and mental illness of depression inspired modern 'arts' with infallibility, and fanatic idolatry, to name just a few.
Fintan, pick up your leftist journalism brownie points somewhere else!
Paul Gordon
From the guardian.co.uk...The Observer, we have the Vatican hate musings of a person whose very name invokes the image of a right of media snobbery upper class heritage.
Fintan O'toole (naturally), assistant editor of the Irish Times, writes with all the fraudulent authority the left has smothered the Euro and American masses with since taking to the throne of the establishment since the years of my youth when the world firmly adopted the religion of Marxism.
I'm sure the Guardian is Canada's Toronto Star, (most infamous for its anti religion, religion section) and Globe and Mail, is Americas New York Times and L. A Times and on and on through out Europe, and free Asia, though probably not Africa as the left deems ignorance and poverty an ensured necessity to 'eternally' champion like the shiny unturned rock, Louisiana (thanks to inferior unionized education) turned out to be, and most of South America.
To the left nothing is cuter than native tribes intrinsic freedom rights to be barbaric, tribal, poor and without medicine or modern technology...how 'worldian' of them, though like abortion they 'personally' would not want that lifestyle for themselves and nor should these natives have too many children.
O'toole is quite right about various entities playing free and loose (with the truth I take it) “for the greater good”, but too conveniently, he omits the greatest propaganda front of all, the print and news-media, with the entertainment industry closely and comfortably accelerating up the rear.
With the news media especially, for all its claimed high moral ground, it is increasingly hard to distinguish between 'fact' and editorial twist and comment.
So here's the Church according to Fintan. “It is not about sex and it is not about Catholicism. It is not, as Pope Benedict rightly argued in yesterday's distressingly bland pastoral letter, about priestly celibacy. It is about power”. Mind you, when you read his whole article it appears it is more about Fintan's personal distaste for the Catholic Church period.
Yes, lay people, Fintan is here to reveal the Church structure, itself.. is the evil of the Church. And here is how Fintan would save the Church. Firstly, he would adhered to the leftist desires of Vatican II, highlighted best by Toronto's deceased Cardinal Carter, early sixties socialist revolutionist, whose greatest accomplishment (going by his biography) was when he (was what moved by the Holy Ghost?) to break into Vatican offices over night, and with liberal accomplices altered Vatican documents to go “their way”.
O'toole would save the Church with the implementation of democracy. The same none religious savior with a non religious entity, that destroyed other churches open to the faddish whims and temporal and secular longings of the majority that works so well politically by morally and financially bankrupting former prosperous nations of the world.
The same entity of sound doctrine that is open to contamination from whatever propaganda laced corruption of 'power' is currently held by, including academia and with hedonistic laws well suited for the perpetuation of mental illness, primary based on the misplaced emotions of mentally ill Hollywood.
Democracy has it's place, but to say it is the cure all, that it is perfection itself, is quite asinine and a dangerous statute to live by. Democracy is the libertarian belief that brings out and enshrines the worst in people along with the best intentions. It is simply another marker of the 'world' not of heaven.
The true evil of the Church is the Left, which made its greatest inroads exactly, during the period of Fintan's fondest memories, Vatican II, the early sixties, the sex and drug revolution, the narcissistic inspired revolutions of feminism, the acceptance by liberal Bishop Conferences of the veto of spiritual givens by individual, leftist establishment 'formed' individual consciences that went against natural inherent consciouses formed by the Holy Ghost.
The true evil of the Church was the acceptance of the Left's greatest victim champions, homosexuals who were welcomed with open arms into the Church and permeated the Church on all but one level.
Not all homosexuals are pedophiles, but like almost all terrorists these days are Muslim, how can it possibly be argued that all men who molest boys are not homosexuals. What truth is this, but the same truth that says homosexuality is normal and healthy?
And too, a less true, or logically applied statement of the left would be hard to find than, 'an unmarried man, or man who does not experience sex with a female, has a unresisting attraction to having sex with little boys, or other men for that matter. That's a heck of a stretch of propaganda.
How can homosexuals cry for non-discrimination on all matters of the world, and yet blame, and attempt to tear down the Church for the actions of its homosexuals that the Pope is now trying to deal with and expel?
The cure to the Church's problems is hardly to emulate the world even more, but to distinguish itself even more.
The religions of the world are atheism, narcissism, pantheism, Marxism, fanatic idolatry equally of the living and the dead, equating nationalism, academia, and mental illness of depression inspired modern 'arts' with infallibility, and fanatic idolatry, to name just a few.
Fintan, pick up your leftist journalism brownie points somewhere else!
Paul Gordon
Sunday, March 14, 2010
If a Commentator Writes in a Forest of Blogs?
If A Commentator Writes in a Forest of Blogs?
Is it 'Human Rights' verboten if no one reads it and is it only verboten if someone is offended?
Or, is it just the blogs of isolated big city oaks that are fair game of the thought police.
With a free flowing searchable Internet anyone can be a commentator and can express his opinions freely in a free country, (hence the trouble between Google and Communist China.)
If what is thought and expressed only depends on who you are, as to be made an example of, then thought policing is not a law of the land equally applied. And if what one believes is not to be freely expressed than perhaps everyone needs to blog to really tie up the thought police with the blogisphere?
Mass civil disobedience in this case, is merely at one's fingertips.
How far is political correctness prepared to go? ...political prisoners?
What are conservatives prepared to do in response? What side is the real law of the land going to fall on in juggling Constitutional rights with faddish activist instigated socialist laws.
I'm just wondering because here is a few things I really believe.
Quick, someone remind me what the freedoms of the free world are again that Churchill and Roosevelt wanted to preserve and have millions die for. In a famous speech Churchill gave to the Canadian Parliament, he mentioned it was anarchy rule that he feared as a result of defeat.
England has just attained the fifty percent tax rate.. That's the old 'one for us, one for you', Marxist shtick. Ontario Canadians are no better off when all the taxes are tallied from HST to property tax, to special 'sin' taxes which now include a whopping fee on gasoline. Meanwhile McGuinty brought in state day care which couldn't even be filled, because only a few activists were actually clamouring for it.
The Ontario State rules that school boards must have prom dances that must allow male adult pedophile friends of teenage boys. And that's just the Catholic schools.
The Ontario State that doesn't allow freedom of speech is the same State that must teach all children on matters of sexuality, and that must begin at five years old...helloooo!
The latest Canadian State, mentally deranged Medal of Canada recipient's daytime job is to kill as many babies as he can get his slimy decrepit fingers on, and on the taxpayer's dollar. What is this, Shudder Island?
The greatest, (make that 'only') revered religion in the world was founded by a tribal murderous bully who was a pedophile of little girls and whose followers, single most important duty is to kill (or standby and snicker while others kill) those who would rather die than switch and submit to any of the religion's latest Arab dictatorship bully, not the one God explained through the ages.
Politicians too eager to please and get re-elected, than lead, like minority appointed Prime Minister Harper feel compelled by the momentum of the tin foil 'kill God' ball to mess with the anthem, of an atheist and anarchy overwrought nation at the mere suggestion by an 'appointed' quasi politician of a Senate where one needs a program to try and distinguish the proletariat from the bourgeoisie.
The United States have answered the question, is it possible for a subversive ego maniac who never grew out of the clutches of Marxist state educators to become President and attempt to implement a five year no return socialist plan, in one.... causing economic extortion and anarchy. Where's the money going now, who has it and to what end? The Chicago way makes it harder to follow.
Hollywood's elite is led by a Tom Hanks who unbelievably calls his country racist for its involvement in World War II and for fighting the insanity known as Islamic terrorism with both hands of the military tied behind their backs, and made to jump in head first.
With a little literary license, Hank's character in Saving Private Ryan exemplifies Hollywood's elitist idiotic interference, when a soldier gets shot trying to protect a little girl but for Hank's character drawing enemy attention in arguing with the soldier to not help the little girl.
The latest nuance added to the politically correct ways of fighting terrorism is not to conduct night time house raids as they are seen as an affront to a Muslim terrorist suspect's pride of not being seen to be able to protect his family.
The richest men in the United States who made their fortunes in great economic irony, through capitalism, contort themselves into the greatest control freak Marxists the U.S. has ever seen and then take bows and shout outs for it. This special elite has taken it upon themselves to depopulate the world anyway they can because they are what..the chosen?.... The ones who personally wouldn't have abortions but would sure as Hell make sure millions of others do, especially those conceived through no fault of there own in third world despotically made poor nations.
In order to feel good about oneself and one's family as a parent, there needs to be a moral code, a focus to at least admire from a distance, a morality one can feel comfortable with, a spirituality of Truth at best... atheism and pantheism at worst.
Moral anarchy and moral relativism is not the Truth that sets one free.
A young woman in nouveau Ontario demanded that all women be given the 'right' to go topless in public in Ontario, certainly not that all women in Ontario were asking her to fight for that right.
The devious Premier at the time, Michael Harris one relative fiscal conservative, with little social conscience, who didn't mind riding in to power on social conservative short lived promises that lasted as long, as not divorcing his family for greener pastures thought it would be cute (?) (I don't know, ask him) not to appeal the first court ruling where she won her case for herself, and all women of Ontario to go topless in public.
The upshot was that the young woman never personally wanted to go topless in public and neither did any of the women she 'stood up' for in Ontario it was just a law that constricted their rights like some semblance of claustrophobia, I can only surmise. Are women really socitial victims just because they don't have the 'right' to damn well do whatever they please? And the men....well there are no men left, are there?
The women's hockey team sure showed the world who the men are in Canada. What, no lesbian pile-ons between cigars and beers under the hot world camera lights?
It wasn't the first time moral relativism was enshrined into law at the bequest of mental illness, mischief, or just plain deviancy in Canada and certainly wasn't the last, with all the homosexual activism based law turnovers and legislation culminating in the right of same sex parents given the right to adopt children based solely on the distinction of their sexually deviant practices from the norm and nature, and of a sub culture fraught with personal and societal mental illness issues.
When the State takes firm atheist and pantheist positions of the Marxist religion and attacks Christianity and morality, it is not a society of confidence for families to thrive in nor a present nation to take pride in, which can only be measured by its current make-up.
As statistically spelled out, solid families and Nations do not thrive in such, especially when said States dictate how one's children should be raised, and educated in one publicly financed and massive union extortion based education system and how all citizens are allowed to think.
Paul Gordon
Is it 'Human Rights' verboten if no one reads it and is it only verboten if someone is offended?
Or, is it just the blogs of isolated big city oaks that are fair game of the thought police.
With a free flowing searchable Internet anyone can be a commentator and can express his opinions freely in a free country, (hence the trouble between Google and Communist China.)
If what is thought and expressed only depends on who you are, as to be made an example of, then thought policing is not a law of the land equally applied. And if what one believes is not to be freely expressed than perhaps everyone needs to blog to really tie up the thought police with the blogisphere?
Mass civil disobedience in this case, is merely at one's fingertips.
How far is political correctness prepared to go? ...political prisoners?
What are conservatives prepared to do in response? What side is the real law of the land going to fall on in juggling Constitutional rights with faddish activist instigated socialist laws.
I'm just wondering because here is a few things I really believe.
Quick, someone remind me what the freedoms of the free world are again that Churchill and Roosevelt wanted to preserve and have millions die for. In a famous speech Churchill gave to the Canadian Parliament, he mentioned it was anarchy rule that he feared as a result of defeat.
England has just attained the fifty percent tax rate.. That's the old 'one for us, one for you', Marxist shtick. Ontario Canadians are no better off when all the taxes are tallied from HST to property tax, to special 'sin' taxes which now include a whopping fee on gasoline. Meanwhile McGuinty brought in state day care which couldn't even be filled, because only a few activists were actually clamouring for it.
The Ontario State rules that school boards must have prom dances that must allow male adult pedophile friends of teenage boys. And that's just the Catholic schools.
The Ontario State that doesn't allow freedom of speech is the same State that must teach all children on matters of sexuality, and that must begin at five years old...helloooo!
The latest Canadian State, mentally deranged Medal of Canada recipient's daytime job is to kill as many babies as he can get his slimy decrepit fingers on, and on the taxpayer's dollar. What is this, Shudder Island?
The greatest, (make that 'only') revered religion in the world was founded by a tribal murderous bully who was a pedophile of little girls and whose followers, single most important duty is to kill (or standby and snicker while others kill) those who would rather die than switch and submit to any of the religion's latest Arab dictatorship bully, not the one God explained through the ages.
Politicians too eager to please and get re-elected, than lead, like minority appointed Prime Minister Harper feel compelled by the momentum of the tin foil 'kill God' ball to mess with the anthem, of an atheist and anarchy overwrought nation at the mere suggestion by an 'appointed' quasi politician of a Senate where one needs a program to try and distinguish the proletariat from the bourgeoisie.
The United States have answered the question, is it possible for a subversive ego maniac who never grew out of the clutches of Marxist state educators to become President and attempt to implement a five year no return socialist plan, in one.... causing economic extortion and anarchy. Where's the money going now, who has it and to what end? The Chicago way makes it harder to follow.
Hollywood's elite is led by a Tom Hanks who unbelievably calls his country racist for its involvement in World War II and for fighting the insanity known as Islamic terrorism with both hands of the military tied behind their backs, and made to jump in head first.
With a little literary license, Hank's character in Saving Private Ryan exemplifies Hollywood's elitist idiotic interference, when a soldier gets shot trying to protect a little girl but for Hank's character drawing enemy attention in arguing with the soldier to not help the little girl.
The latest nuance added to the politically correct ways of fighting terrorism is not to conduct night time house raids as they are seen as an affront to a Muslim terrorist suspect's pride of not being seen to be able to protect his family.
The richest men in the United States who made their fortunes in great economic irony, through capitalism, contort themselves into the greatest control freak Marxists the U.S. has ever seen and then take bows and shout outs for it. This special elite has taken it upon themselves to depopulate the world anyway they can because they are what..the chosen?.... The ones who personally wouldn't have abortions but would sure as Hell make sure millions of others do, especially those conceived through no fault of there own in third world despotically made poor nations.
In order to feel good about oneself and one's family as a parent, there needs to be a moral code, a focus to at least admire from a distance, a morality one can feel comfortable with, a spirituality of Truth at best... atheism and pantheism at worst.
Moral anarchy and moral relativism is not the Truth that sets one free.
A young woman in nouveau Ontario demanded that all women be given the 'right' to go topless in public in Ontario, certainly not that all women in Ontario were asking her to fight for that right.
The devious Premier at the time, Michael Harris one relative fiscal conservative, with little social conscience, who didn't mind riding in to power on social conservative short lived promises that lasted as long, as not divorcing his family for greener pastures thought it would be cute (?) (I don't know, ask him) not to appeal the first court ruling where she won her case for herself, and all women of Ontario to go topless in public.
The upshot was that the young woman never personally wanted to go topless in public and neither did any of the women she 'stood up' for in Ontario it was just a law that constricted their rights like some semblance of claustrophobia, I can only surmise. Are women really socitial victims just because they don't have the 'right' to damn well do whatever they please? And the men....well there are no men left, are there?
The women's hockey team sure showed the world who the men are in Canada. What, no lesbian pile-ons between cigars and beers under the hot world camera lights?
It wasn't the first time moral relativism was enshrined into law at the bequest of mental illness, mischief, or just plain deviancy in Canada and certainly wasn't the last, with all the homosexual activism based law turnovers and legislation culminating in the right of same sex parents given the right to adopt children based solely on the distinction of their sexually deviant practices from the norm and nature, and of a sub culture fraught with personal and societal mental illness issues.
When the State takes firm atheist and pantheist positions of the Marxist religion and attacks Christianity and morality, it is not a society of confidence for families to thrive in nor a present nation to take pride in, which can only be measured by its current make-up.
As statistically spelled out, solid families and Nations do not thrive in such, especially when said States dictate how one's children should be raised, and educated in one publicly financed and massive union extortion based education system and how all citizens are allowed to think.
Paul Gordon
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Limbaugh and Levin Possibly Jealous of Glenn Beck's Success?
Limbaugh and Levin Possibly Jealous of Glenn Beck’s Success?
Mark Levin recently branded Glenn Beck as a clown, forgetting that he, himself treats his listeners annually, (and daily.. seasonally) to scores of his transvestite score, Walking in a Winter Wonderland. Hey, Mark, as Hannity told you, “It wasn’t funny the first time”.
Stuck on stupid, in this case Republican celebrities, the Reaganite worshippers of talk radio believe Ronald Reagan the Hollywood actor was greater than Jesus, and a little less than God, (for Trinity non-believers,) and that the Republican Party needs to be elected at all costs, because they are the ‘good guys’.
The Reaganites are also stuck on other political celebrities over say ...conservatism with boundaries, like Rudy Giuliani, Joe Lieberman, and now Dick Cheney who is now best publicly known for supporting homo-marriages, homo-adoptions, and open homo militaries.
Levin, himself, Limbaugh, and other talk radio Republicans, supported Giuliani for Republican leader and couldn’t get enough of Lieberman wherever he wanted to go. Both of these political celebrities are well known for being pro-homosexual activism, and pro- abortion supporters to cover their liberal all around populist bases.
So despite the odd minor Republican protest uttered from Reaganite lips when they feel it can be helpful,( and remember, Reagan nor the Mrs. ever did anything for Christian pro family and pro life supporters...more said the children and babies they stand for) the thing to do, according to Levin and Limbaugh is to elect the Republicans at any cost and open up the tent if they have to.
I remind social conservatives of a bitter Rush Limbaugh after the mid-terms under George Bush, when the democrats won a majority in the Senate.
Addressing social conservatives directly, Rush snidely stated, “You were never going to accomplish anything prolife in the first place”
And yet, they still feel a big tent is necessary to defeat the worst President and Party in the history of the United States of America??
Where do Levin and Limbaugh personally stand on homosexual activism and abortion? They’re always referring to others, but what exactly do they believe and who do they support and not support on these matters?
I have a relative who only believes in voting for the party he believes has the best chance of winning. How asinine is that? Sports teams enjoy more loyalty.
Yet, as banal as politics sound, nothing more affects all aspects of life including, health and death, how much of one’s earnings one is allowed to keep, and all manner of life in between. But, let’s just vote for the second worse team, because they have some dead celebrities we once lived vicariously through, and we don’t want to be associated with losing teams.
I appreciate the sentimental factor for Cheney, but c’mon Cheney’s wife and daughter don’t make the whole homosexual agenda with all its strong pedophile links an okay lifestyle, and more, a dominant force with Human Rights/Thought Police enforcement power, and State sanctioned academic power entrenched in law over the rights of families and children.
I suspect an elected big tent Republican party doesn’t mean a rats rear-end to most American social conservatives, burned once too often by Republican savvy celebrities, and that they will leave Obama in power over, non-principled traitorous friends.
How else will the historical Republican nefarious status quo be changed?
By no means, a whole hog... Glenn Beck supporter either...
Paul Gordon
Mark Levin recently branded Glenn Beck as a clown, forgetting that he, himself treats his listeners annually, (and daily.. seasonally) to scores of his transvestite score, Walking in a Winter Wonderland. Hey, Mark, as Hannity told you, “It wasn’t funny the first time”.
Stuck on stupid, in this case Republican celebrities, the Reaganite worshippers of talk radio believe Ronald Reagan the Hollywood actor was greater than Jesus, and a little less than God, (for Trinity non-believers,) and that the Republican Party needs to be elected at all costs, because they are the ‘good guys’.
The Reaganites are also stuck on other political celebrities over say ...conservatism with boundaries, like Rudy Giuliani, Joe Lieberman, and now Dick Cheney who is now best publicly known for supporting homo-marriages, homo-adoptions, and open homo militaries.
Levin, himself, Limbaugh, and other talk radio Republicans, supported Giuliani for Republican leader and couldn’t get enough of Lieberman wherever he wanted to go. Both of these political celebrities are well known for being pro-homosexual activism, and pro- abortion supporters to cover their liberal all around populist bases.
So despite the odd minor Republican protest uttered from Reaganite lips when they feel it can be helpful,( and remember, Reagan nor the Mrs. ever did anything for Christian pro family and pro life supporters...more said the children and babies they stand for) the thing to do, according to Levin and Limbaugh is to elect the Republicans at any cost and open up the tent if they have to.
I remind social conservatives of a bitter Rush Limbaugh after the mid-terms under George Bush, when the democrats won a majority in the Senate.
Addressing social conservatives directly, Rush snidely stated, “You were never going to accomplish anything prolife in the first place”
And yet, they still feel a big tent is necessary to defeat the worst President and Party in the history of the United States of America??
Where do Levin and Limbaugh personally stand on homosexual activism and abortion? They’re always referring to others, but what exactly do they believe and who do they support and not support on these matters?
I have a relative who only believes in voting for the party he believes has the best chance of winning. How asinine is that? Sports teams enjoy more loyalty.
Yet, as banal as politics sound, nothing more affects all aspects of life including, health and death, how much of one’s earnings one is allowed to keep, and all manner of life in between. But, let’s just vote for the second worse team, because they have some dead celebrities we once lived vicariously through, and we don’t want to be associated with losing teams.
I appreciate the sentimental factor for Cheney, but c’mon Cheney’s wife and daughter don’t make the whole homosexual agenda with all its strong pedophile links an okay lifestyle, and more, a dominant force with Human Rights/Thought Police enforcement power, and State sanctioned academic power entrenched in law over the rights of families and children.
I suspect an elected big tent Republican party doesn’t mean a rats rear-end to most American social conservatives, burned once too often by Republican savvy celebrities, and that they will leave Obama in power over, non-principled traitorous friends.
How else will the historical Republican nefarious status quo be changed?
By no means, a whole hog... Glenn Beck supporter either...
Paul Gordon
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Dick Cheney Word Association Doesn't = Social Conservative
Dick Cheney Word Association Doesn’t = Social Conservative
The first things that now come to mind when George Bush’s former VP is now mentioned is that he has a lesbian daughter, a wife who wrote lesbian passages in a novel, that he is okay with homosexual marriages and now that he is okay with open homosexuality in the armed forces.
Whether or not Cheney felt obligated to his family to become publicly supportive of public homosexuality matters not. If all parents adopted and applauded the ways of biological children who tend to naturally revolt (with great help from culture and academia), for periods in their lives, from parents like the Reagans, and the McCains, countless police officers/ chiefs, judges, doctors, celebrities then parenthood would be abdicated (which actually it has..I know).
Misplaced sympathies, hedonistic narcissism, and Christian hatred will buy a huge slice of political correctness, over hedonistic narcissism and Christian hatred, alone.
Dick Cheney’s daughter’s embracing of the homosexual lifestyle does not suddenly make homosexual ‘marriages’, homosexual adoptions, and the military allowing open homosexual lifestyles okay.
CPAC ‘s role in the conservative movement needs to be questioned by all and avoided by any social conservative participation.
These misplaced sympathies really got the ball rolling through the entertainment industry when Tom Hanks kicked off his movie career, selling out America by kissing a man and starting the tears rolling for men having anal sex with other men with a sympathy (beyond what most homosexual men would even stomach for themselves,) but for the propaganda powers of the homosexual activists to turn sympathy into immoral acceptance of AIDS carriers.
No other STD including syphilis has been so ingratiated to perform this trick. Female prostitutes presumably because they charge money and don’t enjoy it, but otherwise, carry out free lifestyles similar to homosexual men (by far the bulk of them) who engage in public and anonymous sex... have no one granting them, special privileges , public freedoms, and especially tear jerk sympathy.
There are no parents and friends of female prostitutes looking for love, acceptance and gratitude for their sexual promiscuous ‘children’ for income.... or fun.
The kindly gentler homosexual propaganda was sopped up by the MSM like the news tabloid, 6o minutes, that kept referring to hospital wards being filled with infected AIDs women and children, though never backed up with actual numbers or official statistics. It was the accepted ‘consensus of science’ of the time..the ‘global warming’ or ‘swine flu’ of day.
(And let us not forget the hundred year media aided coat hanger hoax. Christians were supposed to reel back at the sight of a coat hanger like vampires at the sight of a cross. The only problem with that crock, is that the feminists at Planned Unparenthood couldn’t produce one martyr or the grave site of one martyr of the thousands who supposedly killed themselves with coat hangers while PP was killing thousands of babies (mostly blacks.)
Oddly, some homosexuals who died from AIDS were not equal to others like the PBS documentary run of the mill homosexual AIDS sufferers. For instance, if the homosexual was famous for playing a heterosexual stud like a Rock Hudson, he was to receive little sympathy, especially, for not coming out of the closet voluntarily.
Wasn’t the population of North America to be long decimated by now, whether or not we felt sorry for, and embraced the homosexual lifestyle of the times?
Now the homosexual greatest crock in the history of man demands that we all throw up our hands, handover our kids, and turn our backs forever because sympathy turned to love, turned to preference, turned to morally good, turned to controlling power.
Now, the State (which is supposed to have, and did have, a Constitution to keep it from being hijacked by any political establishment) has joined the North American cultural abyss of Hell and is holding the door open for the leftist establishment to toss our kids down the stairs.
With tons of new real conservative talent conservatives don’t need any more help from CPAC libertarians or Dick Cheney, and his monstrous piece of chained baggage... the resurrection of a ‘big tent’ Republican Party.
Cheney had more than his chance to make a difference and social conservatism was obliviously never high on his to- do list. I’m not exactly sure what Cheney should be credited with, except winning a debate hands- down against an infamous adulterous liberal trial lawyer and ego maniac.
Cheney needs to quietly and gracefully step aside, and work out his personal grudges some other less conservative ‘representative’ way. Otherwise, he has neither God, nor Country’s best interest at heart.
Sorry, Dick, but now as your former boss told everyone, “You are either with us or you are against us”.
Christ didn’t die on a cross so you, I, and all parents could be comfortable our entire lives, nor that the CPAC or the Republican Party could be as smug, obnoxious, and politically correct as the Democrats. At minimum, we have to talk the talk and not try to please everyone.
Paul Gordon
The first things that now come to mind when George Bush’s former VP is now mentioned is that he has a lesbian daughter, a wife who wrote lesbian passages in a novel, that he is okay with homosexual marriages and now that he is okay with open homosexuality in the armed forces.
Whether or not Cheney felt obligated to his family to become publicly supportive of public homosexuality matters not. If all parents adopted and applauded the ways of biological children who tend to naturally revolt (with great help from culture and academia), for periods in their lives, from parents like the Reagans, and the McCains, countless police officers/ chiefs, judges, doctors, celebrities then parenthood would be abdicated (which actually it has..I know).
Misplaced sympathies, hedonistic narcissism, and Christian hatred will buy a huge slice of political correctness, over hedonistic narcissism and Christian hatred, alone.
Dick Cheney’s daughter’s embracing of the homosexual lifestyle does not suddenly make homosexual ‘marriages’, homosexual adoptions, and the military allowing open homosexual lifestyles okay.
CPAC ‘s role in the conservative movement needs to be questioned by all and avoided by any social conservative participation.
These misplaced sympathies really got the ball rolling through the entertainment industry when Tom Hanks kicked off his movie career, selling out America by kissing a man and starting the tears rolling for men having anal sex with other men with a sympathy (beyond what most homosexual men would even stomach for themselves,) but for the propaganda powers of the homosexual activists to turn sympathy into immoral acceptance of AIDS carriers.
No other STD including syphilis has been so ingratiated to perform this trick. Female prostitutes presumably because they charge money and don’t enjoy it, but otherwise, carry out free lifestyles similar to homosexual men (by far the bulk of them) who engage in public and anonymous sex... have no one granting them, special privileges , public freedoms, and especially tear jerk sympathy.
There are no parents and friends of female prostitutes looking for love, acceptance and gratitude for their sexual promiscuous ‘children’ for income.... or fun.
The kindly gentler homosexual propaganda was sopped up by the MSM like the news tabloid, 6o minutes, that kept referring to hospital wards being filled with infected AIDs women and children, though never backed up with actual numbers or official statistics. It was the accepted ‘consensus of science’ of the time..the ‘global warming’ or ‘swine flu’ of day.
(And let us not forget the hundred year media aided coat hanger hoax. Christians were supposed to reel back at the sight of a coat hanger like vampires at the sight of a cross. The only problem with that crock, is that the feminists at Planned Unparenthood couldn’t produce one martyr or the grave site of one martyr of the thousands who supposedly killed themselves with coat hangers while PP was killing thousands of babies (mostly blacks.)
Oddly, some homosexuals who died from AIDS were not equal to others like the PBS documentary run of the mill homosexual AIDS sufferers. For instance, if the homosexual was famous for playing a heterosexual stud like a Rock Hudson, he was to receive little sympathy, especially, for not coming out of the closet voluntarily.
Wasn’t the population of North America to be long decimated by now, whether or not we felt sorry for, and embraced the homosexual lifestyle of the times?
Now the homosexual greatest crock in the history of man demands that we all throw up our hands, handover our kids, and turn our backs forever because sympathy turned to love, turned to preference, turned to morally good, turned to controlling power.
Now, the State (which is supposed to have, and did have, a Constitution to keep it from being hijacked by any political establishment) has joined the North American cultural abyss of Hell and is holding the door open for the leftist establishment to toss our kids down the stairs.
With tons of new real conservative talent conservatives don’t need any more help from CPAC libertarians or Dick Cheney, and his monstrous piece of chained baggage... the resurrection of a ‘big tent’ Republican Party.
Cheney had more than his chance to make a difference and social conservatism was obliviously never high on his to- do list. I’m not exactly sure what Cheney should be credited with, except winning a debate hands- down against an infamous adulterous liberal trial lawyer and ego maniac.
Cheney needs to quietly and gracefully step aside, and work out his personal grudges some other less conservative ‘representative’ way. Otherwise, he has neither God, nor Country’s best interest at heart.
Sorry, Dick, but now as your former boss told everyone, “You are either with us or you are against us”.
Christ didn’t die on a cross so you, I, and all parents could be comfortable our entire lives, nor that the CPAC or the Republican Party could be as smug, obnoxious, and politically correct as the Democrats. At minimum, we have to talk the talk and not try to please everyone.
Paul Gordon
Sunday, February 14, 2010
The Equally Created Men Who Embraced Evil
The Equally Created Men Who Embraced Evil
Of course, all men are created equal though millions of personal ego’s have a hard time dealing with that truth. Would the billionaires of America be so obsessed with de-populating the blacks and Indians of third world nations if the populations were still high but consisted of the rich or middle income white techno nerds.
Would the British National Geographic type snobs of years gone by still think it social unchallengeable perfection to let tribal blacks remain inbred savages, barking at the moon, mistreat, and disfigure females, and left to fear tribal bullies and witch doctors if such tribes were Netherlands’ white.
Of course, the modern Western version of this thinking has it’s socialist financial benefits as well. Treatable people with serious mental illness are kept out of government aid, to roam urban downtown centres, even from temporary medicinal treatments to make them no danger to themselves or others because it is their ‘right’ to do so.
Of course, the greatest reason mentally ill people live this nomadic urban lifestyle is probably not their desire to exercise such a right to live such an abusive loveless unhealthy transient lifestyle, but simply a matter of being incapable of attaining proper medications and taking regular maintenance doses of medication.
But, that’s how much the leftist, establishment with all its evil tentacles loves you. Give you all forms of drugs equal to street addictive drugs all you want with free needle exchanges. Give you housing you wouldn’t know how to appreciate or stay in, in such a mental illness state, all the while doing actually nothing to seriously aid you.
It’s like the modern world of academia, art and culture embrace mental illness as something to be aspired to, to be nourished and to be granted special rights, and through academic political correctness, convince the media, the entertainment world, the judicial, and the political world, to adopt.
Just such an insanity inspired movement, at least in Ontario, (I suspect on a much broader scale,) is in action to have bed- rails removed from elderly nursing home patients, so they will not appear to be degraded by ‘others’, as human beings.
Not to be blamed, families are dragging mattresses to the floor to put their elderly dementia prone parents on.. for safety. I know of such first hand as a former employee of the provider.. aspect.
Men, unequal themselves from equality the minute they wholly embrace evil typically originating through the portal of some modern notion of greyish morality.
Contrary to the political correctness of some professional (as in making a good living) Holier than Christ, ‘pro-life groups’, I do not consider the lives of men who embrace evil and make a wealthy living out of killing innocent babies on some modern irreproachable stoned commandment of ‘women’s rights’ equal to babies lives, to those who would defend babies with their own lives.
I do not equate ‘grown-ups’ like Bill Clinton who single-handedly, ensured with the power of Executive Veto, that partial-birth killings would continue under U.S. law when even his own party saw the senselessness of killing healthy babies already halfway out of the birth canal with the lives of babies or the righteous.
I do not equate ‘grown-ups’ like Obama (a person with the power to end the senseless U.S. long held liberal practice of killing black babies) and his indulgent admirers, with his reaffirming of a law to let already born, black babies starve to death in morgue- like empty rooms, with the souls of equally created babies and children or of the righteous.
Of course, I do believe in the reconciliation aspect of Catholicism and the redemption of all souls, but not at the unapologetic expense of ‘actively’ killing the innocent, babies, children women or men and most repulsively at the hands of mercenary, politicians or medical money makers.
Christ had dinner with the sinners like you and me, the tax-collectors.
He didn’t have dinner with blood thirsty murderers and the possessed, such as Order of Canada winner, Dr. Henry Morgentaler who enshrined disgrace on the whole award and modern perception of the hijacked Nation. Thousands of Nazi ground soldiers had more intergriety and honour than Morgentaler, who ironically spent some child time in a killing camp of Hitler's, himself, where Hank apparently appreciated killing over life.
Christ drove evil spirits out of the murderers and the possessed and into pigs, something we cannot do, that would really make life easier were we truly on a level of God and with His tools at our disposal.
But as the Vatican would agree, men were not meant to be ultimate pacifists, (and abdicate the world to Hell), as Christ was not. They are meant to do at least some work of the Saints and to defend the lives and souls of the innocent, laying down their lives, if necessary. Surely, Christ died for something not nothing, like ‘I only care about myself’.
I’m not personally advocating anyone harm, but neither do I lose sleep when the life and practice of an evil person is ended by any means. Nor do I wring-out the crying towel in sanctimonious tears that some evil S.O.B. lost his chance for eternal repentance, while making a good and populist living, killing, empowering, or allotting....... for the slaughter of innocents.
I, as most, can do little for the saving of anyone’s soul, except possibly my own, and if I could, I wouldn’t start with, or pretend to take guardianship of, evil superstars.... over those without blood and pure evil accomplice on their hands, and closer to home.
May the modern thought police never be allowed lay of hands on me and the political correctness and strategies of paid pro-life groups end.
Any support to pro-abort Parties or lukewarm politicians is a strategy to ensure the status-quo... and traitorous to the unborn. People can only be impressed or inspired with the truth not lukewarm trade-offs and strategies on futures.
Paul Gordon
Of course, all men are created equal though millions of personal ego’s have a hard time dealing with that truth. Would the billionaires of America be so obsessed with de-populating the blacks and Indians of third world nations if the populations were still high but consisted of the rich or middle income white techno nerds.
Would the British National Geographic type snobs of years gone by still think it social unchallengeable perfection to let tribal blacks remain inbred savages, barking at the moon, mistreat, and disfigure females, and left to fear tribal bullies and witch doctors if such tribes were Netherlands’ white.
Of course, the modern Western version of this thinking has it’s socialist financial benefits as well. Treatable people with serious mental illness are kept out of government aid, to roam urban downtown centres, even from temporary medicinal treatments to make them no danger to themselves or others because it is their ‘right’ to do so.
Of course, the greatest reason mentally ill people live this nomadic urban lifestyle is probably not their desire to exercise such a right to live such an abusive loveless unhealthy transient lifestyle, but simply a matter of being incapable of attaining proper medications and taking regular maintenance doses of medication.
But, that’s how much the leftist, establishment with all its evil tentacles loves you. Give you all forms of drugs equal to street addictive drugs all you want with free needle exchanges. Give you housing you wouldn’t know how to appreciate or stay in, in such a mental illness state, all the while doing actually nothing to seriously aid you.
It’s like the modern world of academia, art and culture embrace mental illness as something to be aspired to, to be nourished and to be granted special rights, and through academic political correctness, convince the media, the entertainment world, the judicial, and the political world, to adopt.
Just such an insanity inspired movement, at least in Ontario, (I suspect on a much broader scale,) is in action to have bed- rails removed from elderly nursing home patients, so they will not appear to be degraded by ‘others’, as human beings.
Not to be blamed, families are dragging mattresses to the floor to put their elderly dementia prone parents on.. for safety. I know of such first hand as a former employee of the provider.. aspect.
Men, unequal themselves from equality the minute they wholly embrace evil typically originating through the portal of some modern notion of greyish morality.
Contrary to the political correctness of some professional (as in making a good living) Holier than Christ, ‘pro-life groups’, I do not consider the lives of men who embrace evil and make a wealthy living out of killing innocent babies on some modern irreproachable stoned commandment of ‘women’s rights’ equal to babies lives, to those who would defend babies with their own lives.
I do not equate ‘grown-ups’ like Bill Clinton who single-handedly, ensured with the power of Executive Veto, that partial-birth killings would continue under U.S. law when even his own party saw the senselessness of killing healthy babies already halfway out of the birth canal with the lives of babies or the righteous.
I do not equate ‘grown-ups’ like Obama (a person with the power to end the senseless U.S. long held liberal practice of killing black babies) and his indulgent admirers, with his reaffirming of a law to let already born, black babies starve to death in morgue- like empty rooms, with the souls of equally created babies and children or of the righteous.
Of course, I do believe in the reconciliation aspect of Catholicism and the redemption of all souls, but not at the unapologetic expense of ‘actively’ killing the innocent, babies, children women or men and most repulsively at the hands of mercenary, politicians or medical money makers.
Christ had dinner with the sinners like you and me, the tax-collectors.
He didn’t have dinner with blood thirsty murderers and the possessed, such as Order of Canada winner, Dr. Henry Morgentaler who enshrined disgrace on the whole award and modern perception of the hijacked Nation. Thousands of Nazi ground soldiers had more intergriety and honour than Morgentaler, who ironically spent some child time in a killing camp of Hitler's, himself, where Hank apparently appreciated killing over life.
Christ drove evil spirits out of the murderers and the possessed and into pigs, something we cannot do, that would really make life easier were we truly on a level of God and with His tools at our disposal.
But as the Vatican would agree, men were not meant to be ultimate pacifists, (and abdicate the world to Hell), as Christ was not. They are meant to do at least some work of the Saints and to defend the lives and souls of the innocent, laying down their lives, if necessary. Surely, Christ died for something not nothing, like ‘I only care about myself’.
I’m not personally advocating anyone harm, but neither do I lose sleep when the life and practice of an evil person is ended by any means. Nor do I wring-out the crying towel in sanctimonious tears that some evil S.O.B. lost his chance for eternal repentance, while making a good and populist living, killing, empowering, or allotting....... for the slaughter of innocents.
I, as most, can do little for the saving of anyone’s soul, except possibly my own, and if I could, I wouldn’t start with, or pretend to take guardianship of, evil superstars.... over those without blood and pure evil accomplice on their hands, and closer to home.
May the modern thought police never be allowed lay of hands on me and the political correctness and strategies of paid pro-life groups end.
Any support to pro-abort Parties or lukewarm politicians is a strategy to ensure the status-quo... and traitorous to the unborn. People can only be impressed or inspired with the truth not lukewarm trade-offs and strategies on futures.
Paul Gordon
Monday, February 1, 2010
Separating Doctors From Death Pimps
Separating Doctors From Death Pimps
For anyone who has read my writings I am not known for supporting any ‘strategies’ against the patient brilliance of evil.
It always involves ego and, or monies and never works out for the ‘good guys’.
There is one way to combat evil and that is with the aid of the unabashed impeccable teachings of Christ and sound principles of Christianity.
(Again, I call on the Vatican to proclaim, Year of Christ The ‘Truth’ if the Vatican really does believe such, and there is no reason, rhyme or logical debate to not believe so.)
Like most social conservatives, I have never trusted a Catholic, pro-life, or quasi pro- life politician, (Brown included) because essentially their job too often is to bend, hide, confound, and in modern times brazenly assault and ridicule truth anyway they possibly can in order to avoid facing political peer disdain at minimum and removal from office at integrity-less perceived worst.
This is the essential beast of the profession of the elected politician, but not a secular ingratiated pass or excuse.
Those elected with the best of intentions or as part of a nefarious career plot from the get-go have all fallen short of even the most reasonable of expectations of pro-life, and pro-child and pro family Christians.. and there are no other kinds.
The business of political ‘parties’ has factually proven the Achilles’ Heal, more so, the bane of democracy over the election of independent thinkers who can exercise their private belief of right and wrong and freedom to vote and make more of a difference for their constituents then the ‘party’ would ever allow them to.
So with all this written I propose, not a strategy, or knew law, but just an exercise of thought for people who pride themselves in being able to know human nature and accurately predict a social outcome based on what has faddishly if not historically proven to be the philosophic factual result of people caring so much about the human rights...the definitions and perimeters of such, if they were personally forced to be active participants in such well spun lofty ideals.
What better social or academic group of elevated prestige to apply this to would there be then, then the highly respected profession of medicine or at least formally highly respected as in the days when the Hippocratic Oath (clear to even the unenlightened) was not contaminated with politics and money itself and actually meant something to those who took the Oath.
I contend that were there such a great depression that in many instances doctors and surgeons could simply not be reimbursed for their skill and practices, that some, though much less than in years past, would actually volunteer to work for free in North American poverty centres and disaster stricken cities at least providing emergency care to those in need of such.
Doctors in the past and even in the present have proven themselves to be the good Samaritans of the day, when faced with legitimate cases dependant on generous compassion.
Now in another situation what if there was a law in a parallel and better universe wherein
1) No abortions could be performed in private clinics or at least performed without direct government real time observation.
2) No doctors could be paid in any manner for any abortion services though legal they would still be.
Hospital clinics would have to rotate various volunteer doctors for only one day a month... even one day a year... to perform abortions to strangers who need not discuss or offer any reason for wishing so, but as an open service to all expectant mothers.
Seriously, how many doctors do you believe would sign up for this ‘civic’ duty, certainly in 99.9 percent of cases if not more, also not being a medical duty, or passing a serious compassionate sniff test, of necessity. nor of one differentiated by anyone. as in the case of current Canadian abortions on demand?
Or in other words, do you believe doctors a non-denominational group for the majority, and at large believe in the narcissistic modern rants of government directed unstable academia, and militant feminists, that the all common abnormal medical interventions of abortions are a human ‘right’ for ‘oppressed’ young women?
I contend they would not, if they have any semblance of a notion of right and wrong (Truth) and if they truly do not want to cause harm... that they were ever diligent of their actions or inactions that will cause death to be unnatural and saved and preserved lives from being no more.
Nor, should they ever have to do such, as an order from the private sector, the government, or an arms length government agency if it isn’t right with them.
Paul Gordon
For anyone who has read my writings I am not known for supporting any ‘strategies’ against the patient brilliance of evil.
It always involves ego and, or monies and never works out for the ‘good guys’.
There is one way to combat evil and that is with the aid of the unabashed impeccable teachings of Christ and sound principles of Christianity.
(Again, I call on the Vatican to proclaim, Year of Christ The ‘Truth’ if the Vatican really does believe such, and there is no reason, rhyme or logical debate to not believe so.)
Like most social conservatives, I have never trusted a Catholic, pro-life, or quasi pro- life politician, (Brown included) because essentially their job too often is to bend, hide, confound, and in modern times brazenly assault and ridicule truth anyway they possibly can in order to avoid facing political peer disdain at minimum and removal from office at integrity-less perceived worst.
This is the essential beast of the profession of the elected politician, but not a secular ingratiated pass or excuse.
Those elected with the best of intentions or as part of a nefarious career plot from the get-go have all fallen short of even the most reasonable of expectations of pro-life, and pro-child and pro family Christians.. and there are no other kinds.
The business of political ‘parties’ has factually proven the Achilles’ Heal, more so, the bane of democracy over the election of independent thinkers who can exercise their private belief of right and wrong and freedom to vote and make more of a difference for their constituents then the ‘party’ would ever allow them to.
So with all this written I propose, not a strategy, or knew law, but just an exercise of thought for people who pride themselves in being able to know human nature and accurately predict a social outcome based on what has faddishly if not historically proven to be the philosophic factual result of people caring so much about the human rights...the definitions and perimeters of such, if they were personally forced to be active participants in such well spun lofty ideals.
What better social or academic group of elevated prestige to apply this to would there be then, then the highly respected profession of medicine or at least formally highly respected as in the days when the Hippocratic Oath (clear to even the unenlightened) was not contaminated with politics and money itself and actually meant something to those who took the Oath.
I contend that were there such a great depression that in many instances doctors and surgeons could simply not be reimbursed for their skill and practices, that some, though much less than in years past, would actually volunteer to work for free in North American poverty centres and disaster stricken cities at least providing emergency care to those in need of such.
Doctors in the past and even in the present have proven themselves to be the good Samaritans of the day, when faced with legitimate cases dependant on generous compassion.
Now in another situation what if there was a law in a parallel and better universe wherein
1) No abortions could be performed in private clinics or at least performed without direct government real time observation.
2) No doctors could be paid in any manner for any abortion services though legal they would still be.
Hospital clinics would have to rotate various volunteer doctors for only one day a month... even one day a year... to perform abortions to strangers who need not discuss or offer any reason for wishing so, but as an open service to all expectant mothers.
Seriously, how many doctors do you believe would sign up for this ‘civic’ duty, certainly in 99.9 percent of cases if not more, also not being a medical duty, or passing a serious compassionate sniff test, of necessity. nor of one differentiated by anyone. as in the case of current Canadian abortions on demand?
Or in other words, do you believe doctors a non-denominational group for the majority, and at large believe in the narcissistic modern rants of government directed unstable academia, and militant feminists, that the all common abnormal medical interventions of abortions are a human ‘right’ for ‘oppressed’ young women?
I contend they would not, if they have any semblance of a notion of right and wrong (Truth) and if they truly do not want to cause harm... that they were ever diligent of their actions or inactions that will cause death to be unnatural and saved and preserved lives from being no more.
Nor, should they ever have to do such, as an order from the private sector, the government, or an arms length government agency if it isn’t right with them.
Paul Gordon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
